Hoskin v. McKenzie et al
| Torreco Hoskins and Torreco Hoskin |
| Jermaine Bullard and Brandon McKenzie |
| 2:2019cv01980 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Gray M Borden |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF TRANSFER - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court ORDERS that this action be and hereby is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 1/7/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Torreco Hoskin. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the Report and Recommendation is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/12/2019. (JLC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Torreco Hoskins. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jermaine Bullard, Brandon McKenzie, filed by Torreco Hoskins.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
