Broadhead v. Terrell et al
| James M Broadhead |
| Antquan Hill, Jeffery Best, R Gaines, K Roy, Reginald Rambo, D Fleeton, M Evans, C Tunstall, A Marks, Knight, L Terrell, C Sutton, R Gasdon, J Rodgers and Edmond |
| 2:2019cv02031 |
| December 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Corey L Maze |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The magistrate judge's report is ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Because the plaintiff failed to pay the filing and administrative fees totaling $400.00 at the time he filed this complaint, the court ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Corey L Maze on 1/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 1983 Complaint Form)(SRD)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by James M Broadhead. For the reasons stated within, is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 1/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 12/18/2019. (SRD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeffery Best, Edmond, M Evans, D Fleeton, R Gaines, R Gasdon, Antquan Hill, Knight, A Marks, Reginald Rambo, J Rodgers, K Roy, C Sutton, L Terrell, C Tunstall, filed by James M Broadhead.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
