Barnett et al v. Bentzen et al
Joseph Thomas Barnett, Jr and David Michael Loper |
Patrick Bentzen and Rhonda Bentzen |
2:2020cv00637 |
May 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Real Property: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Patrick Bentzen, Rhonda Bentzen.(Collins, Philip) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Patrick Bentzen, Rhonda Bentzen. (Collins, Philip) Modified on 6/30/2020 (KAM, ). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joseph Thomas Barnett, Jr, David Michael Loper. Patrick Bentzen served on 6/5/2020, answer due 6/26/2020; Rhonda Bentzen served on 6/5/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (MRR, ) |
Filing 5 Alias Summons Issued as to Patrick Bentzen, Rhonda Bentzen, sent via certified mail (MRR, ) |
Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Joseph Thomas Barnett, Jr, David Michael Loper. (Bethay, John) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Patrick Bentzen, Rhonda Bentzen., returned to pltf in SASE for service (MRR, ) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601105790 (MRR, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joseph Thomas Barnett, David Michael Loper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.