U S Specialty Insurance Company v. Trawick Contractors Inc
| U S Specialty Insurance Company |
| Trawick Contractors Inc |
| 2:2021cv00378 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: The Court grants Attorney Edward P. Meyerson's motion to withdraw as counsel of record in this action. (Doc. #9 ). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/6/2021. (YMB)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Trawick Contractors Inc. (Meyerson, Edward)
|
|
Filing 8
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U S Specialty Insurance Company. Trawick Contractors Inc waiver sent on 3/15/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. (Stiff, L)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons and Complaint Returned With COVID-19 Notation from Postal Employee (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Reassignment- Because the parties have not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Madeline Hughes Haikala. Please use case number 2:21-cv-378-MHH on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius no longer assigned to the case. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Expedite Non-Party Discovery Motion is RIPE 3/18/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by U S Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to E)(Stiff, L)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Quash NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS by Trawick Contractors Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Garrison, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Trawick Contractors Inc. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Trawick Contractors Inc, filed by U S Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(MRR, )
|
|
Request for service by certified mail filed by U S Specialty Insurance Company, as stated in the Complaint #1 . (MEB2)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number B4601112006 (MRR, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: U S Specialty Insurance Company v. Trawick Contractors Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trawick Contractors Inc | |
| Represented By: | Edward P Meyerson |
| Represented By: | Kevin R Garrison |
| Represented By: | Vincent G Nelan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: U S Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | L Graves Stiff, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
