Taylor v. Yellen et al
Rita D Taylor |
Janet Yellen, Mark B Garland, Paula McCormack, Prim Escleona, Charles P Rettig, Thomas Battle, Jr, Trey Riley, Kirk Giles, Hon. Steve Marshall, Richard S Flannary, Cody Downs and John Hamm |
2:2022cv00596 |
May 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Nicholas A Danella |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Complainant's Joined Motions For Leave and Extension Proceedings by Rita D Taylor. (DNW) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL. You must complete the attached form to indicate whether you consent to proceed before the assigned magistrate judge or decline to proceed before the assigned magistrate judge. (DNW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE (Request) for Electronic Noticing by Rita D Taylor (MEB2) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rita D Taylor. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (MEB2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Battle, Jr, Cody Downs, Prim Escleona, Richard S Flannary, Mark B Garland, Kirk Giles, John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Paula McCormack, Charles P Rettig, Trey Riley, Janet Yellen, filed by Rita D Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (MEB2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.