Whitworth v. Alabama, State of et al
| Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr |
| Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama |
| 2:2022cv00881 |
| July 15, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 MOTION To Reconsider Denial of Leave to Amend 2254 Petition by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (DNW) |
Filing 17
TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Respondents' Answers are due on or before 10/7/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 09/09/2022. (SUH)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Alabama, State of. (Dodd, Stephen) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: It is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 8) is DENIED. It is ORDERED that these motions (Docs. 9 & 14) are DENIED. It is ORDERED that this motion (Doc. 13) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/30/2022. (DNW)
|
| Filing 14 REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED GRANTING OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 2254 PETITION by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (JLC) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (JLC) |
| Filing 12 Stipulation for Entry of Order by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (JLC) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attempt to Resolve by Agreement of the Parties by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (JLC) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen N Dodd on behalf of Alabama, State of, Attorney General of the State of Alabama (Dodd, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Amend 2254 Petition by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Amended 2254 Petition)(KEK) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Direct Transmittal of pages of the Record on Appeal by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (KEK) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER - Whitworth has filed a motion to stay and hold his petition in abeyance until the release of a "Forensic Document Examination Report." Doc. #3 . Upon review, it is ORDERED that this motion (Doc. #3 ) is DENIED. Whitworth also has filed a motion to direct the State of Alabama to supply the court with his "Second Supplemental Record on Appeal." Doc. #4 . The court will review the state-court evidence to be supplied by the respondents and any other evidence necessary to the disposition of Whitworth's petition in due course. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #4 ) is DENIED. Finally, Whitworth has filed a motion to be allowed to file a reply to the respondents' response. Doc. #5 . For good cause, it is ORDERED that this motion (Doc. #5 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the respondents are ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing within 30 days why the petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/10/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number ALND B206. (KEK) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE re: case number. (KEK) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to be Allowed to Reply to Any Government Response by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (KEK) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Direct Transmittal of Second Supplemental Record on Appeal and to Incorporate this Record on Appeal by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (KEK) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay and Abeyance by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE re: filing fee by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ronald Loyd Whitworth, Jr.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
