Edwards v. City of Leeds, Alabama
| Virginia Edwards |
| City of Leeds, Alabama |
| 2:2024cv01386 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Annemarie Carney Axon. Please use case number 2:24-cv-1386-ACA on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge John H England, III no longer assigned to the case. The telephone conference set for 1:45 pm on December 5, 2024 is CANCELLED. (KNS) |
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/12/2024. (KNS)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than December 20, 2024. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after December 20, 2024. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 1:45 pm on December 5, 2024. The parties are DIRECTED to call 205-931-0422 to access the telephone conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/12/2024. (KNS)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Leeds, Alabama.(May, T) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Virginia Edwards. All Defendants. (Bearden, Richard) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued by the clerk as to City of Leeds, Alabama. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KNS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (KNS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Leeds, Alabama filed by Virginia Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4699588. related document #1 COMPLAINT against City of Leeds, Alabama, filed by Virginia Edwards. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS). (Bearden, Richard) Modified on 10/11/2024. ALND Rec# b-14179 (KNS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Edwards v. City of Leeds, Alabama | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virginia Edwards | |
| Represented By: | Richard A Bearden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Leeds, Alabama | |
| Represented By: | T Kelly May |
| Represented By: | Hugh Cannon Lawley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
