Ragland v. City of Florence, Alabama et al

Plaintiff: Danielle Monique Ragland
Defendant: City of Florence, Alabama and Bradley Landers
Case Number: 3:2015cv02262
Filed: December 15, 2015
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Lauderdale
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ragland v. City of Florence, Alabama et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Monique Ragland
Represented By: Michael Levoy Weathers(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Florence, Alabama
Represented By: Ian Michael Berry(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Larry B Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Landers
Represented By: Ian Michael Berry(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Larry B Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?