Dixon v. Frost-Arnett Company
Sandra Dixon |
Frost-Arnett Company |
3:2019cv00517 |
April 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Liles C Burke |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: that certain time limits and deadlines apply as set out in this order; Discovery due by 3/6/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 4/17/2020; Witness and Exhibit Lists due by 5/22/2020; Trial ready by 6/2020. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 6/25/2019. (AHI) |
Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Lam, Tina) |
Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Frost-Arnett Company.(Moore, Neal) |
Filing 11 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 05/03/19. (SPT ) |
Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The defendant's responsive pleading shall be filed by May 23, 2019. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 5/3/2019. (KBW) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Frost-Arnett Company. filed by Frost-Arnett Company (Lam, Tina) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Frost-Arnett Company. (Moore, Neal) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Frost-Arnett Company served on 4/11/2019, answer due 5/2/2019. (AHI) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Frost-Arnett Company. (AHI) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Sandra Dixon (Sykstus, Ronald) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 4/2/2019. (KBW) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3313980 (B4601096467). related document #1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against Frost-Arnett Company filed by Sandra Dixon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(AHI ). (Philipps, David) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3314008 (B4601096468). (Philipps, David) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3314017 (B4601096469). (Philipps, David) |
Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Sandra Dixon. (AHI) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear PHV for David Philipps and Mary E. Philipps by Sandra Dixon. (AHI) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against Frost-Arnett Company filed by Sandra Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(AHI ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dixon v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sandra Dixon | |
Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
Represented By: | Tina Lam |
Represented By: | Neal D Moore, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.