Watkins v. Colbert County Jail et al
| Ashley Sherrell Watkins |
| Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Colbert County Jail |
| 3:2019cv00969 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| John E Ott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - More than 30 days have passed, and Petitioner has failed to comply with or otherwise respond to the June 25, 2019 order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/1/2019. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER - Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, accompanied by a declaration in support of her request to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. #2 ). Because the declaration reveals that petitioner received into her jail trust account average deposits of approximately $43.25 per month for the previous four months, it appears that she can afford to pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. #2 ) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 6/25/2019. (KEK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashley Sherrell Watkins. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ashley Sherrell Watkins.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
