Willmore-Cochran v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff: Amy Lynn Willmore-Cochran
Defendant: Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2011cv02140
Filed: June 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Middle Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 14 , MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as further set out in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 01/22/13. (CVA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willmore-Cochran v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Lynn Willmore-Cochran
Represented By: Russell P Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan S Harbuck
Represented By: Lynlee Wells Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?