Zatarain v. Acceptance Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Carlos Zatarain
Defendant: Acceptance Insurance Company
Case Number: 4:2015cv01148
Filed: July 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Middle Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 8 MOTION to Dismiss and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/2/2016. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zatarain v. Acceptance Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Zatarain
Represented By: Ahmad M Shabani
Represented By: Michael Moosavi Shabani
Represented By: Tim R Wadsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acceptance Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?