Saed v. Hassel

Petitioner: Hasaballa Iessa Abdalla Saed
Respondent: Scott Hassel
Case Number: 4:2016cv00594
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Middle Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Referring Judge: T Michael Putnam
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 25, 2017 15 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herewith, and with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it hereby is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that petitioner's claim brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/25/2017. (PSM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saed v. Hassel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hasaballa Iessa Abdalla Saed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Hassel
Represented By: Jason R Cheek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?