Spears v. Rainsville Technology Inc

Plaintiff: Warren Spears
Defendant: Rainsville Technology Inc
Case Number: 4:2016cv00902
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Middle Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29:201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 19, 2016 17 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING ORDER APPROVING OFFER OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/19/2016. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spears v. Rainsville Technology Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Spears
Represented By: David R Arendall(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Allen Durham Arnold(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rainsville Technology Inc
Represented By: John James Coleman, III
Represented By: Ronald W Flowers, Jr(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Henry C Hilson(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?