Armstrong et al v. Boaz, City of et al
| Robin Zak Armstrong and Timothy-Brian Armstrong |
| Boaz, City of, Tim Walker, Danny L Smith, Michael Hempel, Quentin Scott and Brandon Hester |
| 4:2016cv01065 |
| June 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| Etowah |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
185
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 2/27/2019. (TLM, )
|
|
Filing
168
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons outlined above, the court DENIES the Plaintiffs motions for leave to amend their complaint. (Doc. 161; Doc. 166). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 8/31/2018. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 51 MOTION to Dismiss. As there are no remaining claims pending against Captain Michael Hempel or the City of Boaz, both parties are hereby TERMINATED as party defendants. The rem aining parties, namely Plaintiffs Robin Zak Armstrong and Timothy-Brian Armstrong and Defendants Brandon Hester and Quentin Scott, are hereby ORDERED to submit a Rule 26(f) report, in accordance with this Court's 24 Uniform Initial Order within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 7/24/2017. (JLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
