United States of America v. Dase et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David Scott Dase, Ditech Financial LLC, Walter D Dase and Anita J Dase
Case Number: 4:2018cv00501
Filed: March 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Middle Office
County: St. Clair
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7403
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 60 - The court GRANTS the government's motion for entry of a decree of foreclosure and order of sale. The court FINDS that the United States has a valid tax lien attaching to Mr. Dase's interest in the pr operty located at 4624 Greensport Road, Ashville, Alabama 35953, as described above, supra at 2. The court DIRECTS the government to submit, on or before March 12, 2020, a proposed judgment of foreclosure and judicial sale of the property, which sets forth the manner in which the sale proceeds are to be distributed, the publication requirements, bidding procedures, and the manner and time of said sale. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 2/27/2020. (KEK)
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The court DENIES the government's motion for summary judgment. The court GRANTS IN PART Mr. Dase's and Ms. Kleinatland's motions for partial summary judgment and ENTERS SUMMARY JUDGMENT in favor of Ms. K leinatland and Mr. Dase and against the government on the government's claim that Mr. Dase owns the property in full. The court DENIES IN PART their motions with respect to their arguments that the government cannot foreclose on the property under 26 U.S.C. § 7403. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 9/23/2019. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Dase et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Elizabeth Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Scott Dase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ditech Financial LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter D Dase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anita J Dase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?