Zikpi v. Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc
| Carolyn Zikpi |
| Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc |
| 4:2018cv01267 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| Jefferson |
| Virginia Emerson Hopkins |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE after having been advised by counsel that the entitled cause has been settled, costs taxed as paid. Further, theCourt RETAINS jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement reached betweenthe parties. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/14/2018. (JLC)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Carolyn Zikpi of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc served on 8/17/2018, answer due 9/7/2018. NOTE: NO DATE LISTED ON GREEN CARD (KWC) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc, mailed by certified US Mail. Article Number 7017 3040 0000 1350 0465 (KWC) Modified on 8/13/2018 by KWC |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for to proceed Pro hac vice as to David Philipps and Mary Philipps. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 8/13/2018. (KWC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W Botes on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Botes, Bradford) |
| Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Carolyn Zikpi. (KWC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps by Carolyn Zikpi. (KWC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of CONSENT TO LOCAL COUNSEL by Carolyn Zikpi. (KWC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc, filed by Carolyn Zikpi.(KWC) (Attachments added on 8/9/2018: #1 Exh A, #(2) Exh B, #(3) Exh C, #(4) Exh D, #(5) Exh E, #(6) Civil Cover Sheet) (KWC) |
| PHV Fee paid for Mary E. Philipps in the amount of $50.00, Credit Card receipt number 1126-3149720, NDAL receipt #B4601091224. (Philipps, David) Modified on 8/10/2018 (JLC). |
| Filing Fee received in the amount of $400.00, Credit Card receipt_number 1126-3149707, NDAL receipt #B4601091222.(Philipps, David) Modified on 8/10/2018 (JLC). |
| PHV Fee paid for David J. Philipps in the amount of $50.00, Credit Card receipt number 1126-3149716, NDAL receipt #B4601091223. (Philipps, David) Modified on 8/10/2018 (JLC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zikpi v. Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Credit Bureau of Bessemer, Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carolyn Zikpi | |
| Represented By: | Bradford W Botes |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
