Ghotra v. Nielsen et al
| Kulvinder Singh Ghotra |
| Kirsten Nielsen, Scott Hassell, Attorney General Jefferson B Sessions, III and David Rivera |
| 4:2018cv01494 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| Alabama Northern District Court |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| John E Ott |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28:2241 |
| None |
RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| 5 RESPONSE in Opposition to Respondent's Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Kulvinder Singh Ghotra. (KEK) |
| 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Scott Hassell, Kirsten Nielsen, David Rivera, Jefferson B Sessions, III. filed by Scott Hassell, Kirsten Nielsen, David Rivera, Jefferson B Sessions, III (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: North Declaration)(Wilson, Sarah) |
| 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Stevens Wilson on behalf of Kirsten Nielsen, David Rivera, Jefferson B Sessions, III (Wilson, Sarah) |
2
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondents APPEAR and SHOW CAUSE in writing, within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this Order, why the relief requested by the petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 9/14/2018. (JLC)
|
| 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5, receipt number ALND B4601092006), filed by Kulvinder Singh Ghotra. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits part 1, #2 Exhibits part 2)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
