Atangana v. Khan et al
| Lionel Roussel Atangana |
| Valburn, Mohamed Khan, P. L. Zaner, Scott Sutterfield, H. Folajaiye and Bacchus |
| 4:2018cv02113 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against P. L. Zaner, filed by Lionel Roussel Atangana.(TLM, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number B4601094661 (TLM, ) |
Filing 2
ORDER Because the plaintiff appears to be challenging his treatment during confinement and not the fact or duration of his confinement, the Clerk is DIRECTED to re-docket the pleading as a complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the proper vehicle for such claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/4/2019. (TLM, )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Petition for writ of Habeas corpus filed 12/27/18 refiled by court as complaint pursuant to court order (doc 2 ) on 1/4/2019) against Bacchus, H. Folajaiye, Mohamed Khan, Scott Sutterfield, Valburn, P. L. Zaner (Filing fee $ 5.00. B4601094326), filed by Lionel Roussel Atangana.(TLM, ) Modified on 1/4/2019 (TLM, ). Modified on 1/4/2019 (TLM, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
