Archilla v. Horton et al
Sarail Michael Archilla |
Chad F Wolf, Diane Witte, Tony H Pham, Jonathan Horton, William Barr and Keith Peek |
4:2020cv01356 |
September 11, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
Corey L Maze |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Response to Order to Show Cause, #6 Order, by Sarail Michael Archilla. (Vosburgh, Jessica) |
![]() |
Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by William Barr, Tony H Pham, Diane Witte, Chad F Wolf. filed by William Barr, Tony H Pham, Diane Witte, Chad F Wolf (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Martin Declaration)(Marshall, Mary) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Lester Marshall on behalf of William Barr, Tony H Pham, Diane Witte, Chad F Wolf (Marshall, Mary) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING Petitioner must either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 9/14/2020. (SRD) |
Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number B4601108413 (MEB2) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Sarail Michael Archilla.(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.