Acoff v. Hatter et al
Plaintiff: Mario Dewayne Acoff
Defendant: Annie L Hatter, Lubinda Hatter, Kathy Hatter-King, Lubirda Hatter and Jefferson County Probate Judge
Case Number: 4:2020cv01659
Filed: October 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Liles C Burke
Referring Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court GRANTS the #4 Motion to Amend/Correct the name of one of the parties, as more fully set out in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/18/2020. (AHI)
November 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Mario DeWayne Acoff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/18/2020. (AHI)
November 5, 2020 Filing 5 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Mario Dewayne Acoff. (BJL)
November 5, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Amend by Mario Dewayne Acoff. (BJL)
October 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/27/2020. (AHI )
October 22, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mario Dewayne Acoff. (KEK)
October 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Annie L Hatter, Lubinda Hatter, Kathy Hatter-King, filed by Mario Dewayne Acoff.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acoff v. Hatter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Annie L Hatter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lubinda Hatter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy Hatter-King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lubirda Hatter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson County Probate Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Dewayne Acoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?