Moore v. Lawrence County Jail et al
Charles Moore |
Lawrence County Jail and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
4:2024cv01313 |
September 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Staci G Cornelius |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 FINAL JUDGMENT - Consistent with the accompanying memorandum opinion and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Costs are taxed as paid. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/20/2024. (MEB2) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 11/20/2024. (MEB2) |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For all the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS this matter be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction as an unauthorized second or successive 2254 petition. Because the instant petition is due to be dismissed as successive, a ruling on a certificate of appealability is not required. The petitioner may file specific written objections within 14 days. Objections to R&R due by 11/11/2024. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/28/2024. (MEB2) |
Habeas Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number B13917 (MEB2) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Moore.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.