Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Northern District Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.

Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Abbott Point of Care Inc.
Defendant:	Epocal, Inc.
Case Number:	5:2008cv00543
Filed:	March 28, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Patent Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit:	Both
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1331 Fed. Question

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 5, 2012	Filing 359 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that it is ORDERED that Epocal is Awarded costs in the amount of $166,680.40; the clerk of the court is directed to tax costs in this amount as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 11/5/2012. (AHI)
April 18, 2012	Filing 288 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER that Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument that Abbott has been harmed by Epocal's alleged conduct is GRANTED inpart and DENIED in part, Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument regarding its FDA 510(k) submissions is GRANTED, Epocal's motion to exclude documents that use certain claim terms outside the context of the patents-in-suit is DENIED, Epocal's motion to exclude arguments and evidence regarding solicitation of empl oyees other than the five at issue in Abbott's tortious interference allegations is DENIED, Epocal should present this court and opposing counsel a draft of a proposed limiting instruction by 4/20/2012, objections no later than 4/23/2012; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 4/18/2012. (AHI)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 5, 2012

Filing 359 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that it is ORDERED that Epocal is Awarded costs in the amount of $166,680.40; the clerk of the court is directed to tax costs in this amount as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 11/5/2012. (AHI)

April 18, 2012

Filing 288 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER that Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument that Abbott has been harmed by Epocal's alleged conduct is GRANTED inpart and DENIED in part, Epocal's motion to exclude evidence and argument regarding its FDA 510(k) submissions is GRANTED, Epocal's motion to exclude documents that use certain claim terms outside the context of the patents-in-suit is DENIED, Epocal's motion to exclude arguments and evidence regarding solicitation of empl oyees other than the five at issue in Abbott's tortious interference allegations is DENIED, Epocal should present this court and opposing counsel a draft of a proposed limiting instruction by 4/20/2012, objections no later than 4/23/2012; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 4/18/2012. (AHI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abbott Point of Care Inc. v. Epocal, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abbott Point of Care Inc.
Represented By:	Angela Holt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Epocal, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?