Stewart v. Acosta Sales & Marketing Company

Plaintiff: Ronnye Bernice Stewart
Defendant: Acosta Sales & Marketing Company and Margaret Loperena
Case Number: 5:2011cv00504
Filed: February 15, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Acosta Sales & Marketing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronnye Bernice Stewart
Represented By: Phillip A Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acosta Sales & Marketing Company
Represented By: John W Hargrove
Represented By: Leonard V Feigel
Represented By: Dabney D Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Loperena
Represented By: Leonard V Feigel
Represented By: John W Hargrove
Represented By: Dabney D Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?