Simpson v. United States of America
Petitioner:
Corey Trinett Simpson
Respondent:
United States of America
Case Number:
5:2011cv08017
Filed:
April 18, 2011
Court:
Alabama Northern District Court
Office:
Northeastern Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge:
Paul W Greene
Presiding Judge:
R David Proctor
Nature of Suit:
Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:
28:2255
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 27, 2014 | 30 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Simpson v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Thomas E Borton, IV |
Represented By: | Mary Stuart Burrell |
Represented By: | Joyce White Vance, US Attorney |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Corey Trinett Simpson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.