Whatley v. United States of America

Petitioner: Jahmal Ahmad Whatley
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2011cv08024
Filed: June 13, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
0 Judge: Harwell G Davis
1 Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 16, 2012 7 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the court is of the opinion that theMagistrate Judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED and it is ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence is DENIED; as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 7/16/2012. (AHI )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whatley v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Laura D Hodge
Represented By: Joyce White Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jahmal Ahmad Whatley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?