Horton v. United Food and Commercial Worker's Union

Plaintiff: Tammy Horton
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Worker's Union
Case Number: 5:2012cv02962
Filed: September 12, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Morgan
Presiding Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 5, 2012 6 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the court, sua sponte, REMANDS this case to the district court of Morgan County, Alabama, consequently, the motions for limited admission pro hac vice for David W. Garrison12 and George E. Barrett13 are DENIED as MOOT, as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 10/5/2012. (AHI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Horton v. United Food and Commercial Worker's Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Worker's Union
Represented By: Glen M Connor
Represented By: Robert M Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?