Smith v. AI Signal Research Inc

Plaintiff: Harold Smith
Defendant: AI Signal Research Inc
Case Number: 5:2013cv00314
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Madison
Presiding Judge: Abdul K Kallon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29:626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 28, 2013 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 16 , MOTION to Dismiss Reply Brief, is DENIED, as further set out in order. 6 , MOTION to Dismiss (FedRCP 12(b)(6)) filed by AI Signal Research Inc, is TERMINATED (is a brief not a motion).Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 05/28/2013. (CVA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. AI Signal Research Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harold Smith
Represented By: Richard P Rouco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AI Signal Research Inc
Represented By: William K Hancock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?