Sparks v. Ingle et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 14, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all claims against Commissioner Dunn; the plaintiffs Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claim against Sheriff Ingle; and the pla intiffs Eighth Amendment condition of confinement claims against defendants Whitley and Ingle. The motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Mr. Sparkss Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claim against Mr. Whitley. By separate order, the Court will order the parties to mediate this claim. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/14/2017. (KEK)
|September 14, 2015
ORDER re: Report and Recommendation - Accordingly, the Court grants Mr. Sparkss first and second motions to amend the complaint. (Docs. 8 , 10 ). The Court denies Mr. Sparks requests for declaratory and injunctive relief and dismisses his claims ag ainst all defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), except the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Whitley, Ingle, and ADOC Commissioner Jefferson Dunn for denial or delay of medical care and inadequate nutrition. The Cou rt denies Mr. Sparkss motion for appointment of counsel and grants his third motion to amend the complaint to the extent he seeks to add ADOC Commissioner Dunn as a party defendant. (Doc. 13 ). The Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment claims against defendants Whitley, Ingle, and Dunn for denial or delay of medical care and the inadequate nutrition claim are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/14/2015. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?