Micor Industries, Inc. v. Mazak Corporation
Plaintiff: Micor Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Mazak Corporation
Case Number: 5:2017cv01408
Filed: August 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northeastern Office
County: Morgan
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Presiding Judge: JU H UnassignedH
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 2/9/2018. (PSM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Micor Industries, Inc. v. Mazak Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Micor Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Jay Aughtman
Represented By: Phillip D Mitchell, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mazak Corporation
Represented By: Hugh Cannon Lawley
Represented By: T Kelly May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?