Arnold v. West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority et al
| Deanna Arnold |
| Dyneon LLC, Daikin America Inc, West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority and 3M Company |
| 5:2018cv01441 |
| September 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL - This case is being reassigned from Judge Haikala to Judge Liles Burke. Please use case number 5:18-CV-1441-LCB on all subsequent pleadings (AHI) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL regarding case assigned to unassigned judge; this case has been referred to Judge Haikala until further notice. Please use case number 5:18-CV-1441-UJH-MHH on all subsequent pleadings (AHI ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3167273 (B4601091799). related document #1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against 3M Company, Daikin America Inc, Dyneon LLC, and West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority filed by Deanna Arnold.(AHI). (Pantazis, Evan) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Deanna Arnold. (AHI) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against 3M Company, Daikin America Inc, Dyneon LLC, and West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority filed by Deanna Arnold.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
