Davis v. Estes et al
| William Earl Davis |
| Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Warden II DeWayne Estes |
| 5:2018cv01617 |
| October 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Respondents shall show cause in writing within 20 days why the relief requested should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/30/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number B4601093070 (KAM) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - Petitioner must either file an application to proceed in formapauperis or pay the filing fee of $5.00. An application to proceed in formapauperis must be verified by an authorized officer of the institution and must beaccompanied by a certified copy of prison account statements for the last sixmonths.If Petitioner fails to correct the deficient pleading in compliance with this notice withinthirty (30) days from the entry date of this notice, the court may dismiss this case for want ofprosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/10/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by William Earl Davis.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
