Bulls v. Estes et al
Petitioner: Reginald Bulls
Respondent: Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Warden Dewayne Estes and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Case Number: 5:2019cv00346
Filed: February 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Referring Judge: John E Ott
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2019 Filing 5 Special Report and ANSWER to Complaint by Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Beckman, Morgan)
April 19, 2019 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes. filed by Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Dewayne Estes (Beckman, Morgan)
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - It is hereby ORDERED that the respondents appear and show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this order, why the relief requested by the petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 4/2/2019. (KEK)
March 22, 2019 Filing Fee received from Reginald Bulls in the amount of $5.00, receipt number B4601096254. (JLC)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The petition in this matter is deficient for the reason indicated below. The petitioner is ORDERED to correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order. The petitioner has failed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee of $5.00. The petitioner must either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5.00 within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 2/28/2019. (KEK)
February 27, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Reginald Bulls.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bulls v. Estes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles
Represented By: Morgan B Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Dewayne Estes
Represented By: Morgan B Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Represented By: Morgan B Beckman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Reginald Bulls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?