White v. Hines et al
Reginald White, Jr |
Scott A Schuttinga and Eric W Hines |
5:2019cv00750 |
May 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Herman N Johnson |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Reginald White Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 5/31/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM filed by Reginald White, Jr. (KEK) |
Filing 3 ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his prison account statements. (Doc. #2 ). The application is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). The undersigned therefore ORDERS the plaintiff to sign and return to the Clerk of Court, within thirty (30) days of the entry date of this Order, the attached Prisoner Consent Form to signify that he wishes to continue with this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 5/20/2019. (KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Reginald White, Jr. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eric W Hines, Scott A Schuttinga, filed by Reginald White, Jr.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.