Synovus Bank v. MRJJ LLC et al
| Synovus Bank |
| Gregory Rhys Battles and MRJJ LLC |
| 5:2021cv00535 |
| April 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - The Court GRANTS the plaintiff's #4 Motion for Leave to Appear by John K. Rezac. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 4/22/2021. (AHI)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Admission of John K. Rezac Motion is RIPE 4/22/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Synovus Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Declaration of John K. Rezac, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Snyder, Reginald) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3824245 (B4601112829). (Snyder, Reginald) Modified on 4/23/2021 (BJL). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants by Clerk and mailed to Plaintiff for service. (BJL) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number B4601112790 (BJL) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Synovus Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
