Kirby v. Sysco Company et al
Gerry Kirby |
Sysco Company and James Hamilton Hall |
5:2021cv01723 |
December 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Maples, Marcus) |
![]() |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Sysco Company.(Maples, Marcus) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by James Hamilton Hall.(Maples, Marcus) |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Motion is RIPE 1/19/2022. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Sysco Company. (Maples, Marcus) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by James Hamilton Hall, Gerry Kirby, and Sysco Company. (BJL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Gerry Kirby re #1 Notice of Removal (Rice, Richard) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by James Hamilton Hall and Sysco Company from The Circuit Court of Limestone County, Alabama, case number 44-CV-2021-900260. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.