Helfers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
| Shelley Elaine Helfers |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner |
| 5:2023cv00730 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Shelley Elaine Helfers, Social Security Administration, Commissioner. (CTF) |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING letter to counsel. Responses due by August 26, 2023. (CTF) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Social Security Administration, Commissioner. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Index, #3 Records Part 1, #4 Records Part 2, #5 Records Part 3, #6 Records Part 4, #7 Records Part 5, #8 Records Part 6, #9 Records Part 7, #10 Records Part 8, #11 Records Part 9, #12 Records Part 10, #13 Records Part 11, #14 Records Part 12, #15 Records Part 13, #16 Records Part 14, #17 Records Part 15, #18 Records Part 16, #19 Records Part 17, #20 Records Part 18, #21 Records Part 19, #22 Records Part 20, #23 Records Part 21, #24 Records Part 22, #25 Records Part 23)(Fazekas, Corey) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Corey Stephen Fazekas on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Fazekas, Corey) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stacy Lynn Upton on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Upton, Stacy) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number AALNDC-4364735, B-5866. (Upton, Stacy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack B Hood on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Hood, Jack) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Presently pending is the motion to allow Marshall W. Conick to appear pro hac vice on behalf of the plaintiff. (Doc. #5 ). The motion, which provides the information required under L.R. 83.1, is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. This conditional grant of pro hac vice status will become final without further order when the Clerk of Court receives the requisite fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 6/8/2023. (CTF)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Choi, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Motion is RIPE 6/6/2023. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Shelley Elaine Helfers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits to Motion for Pro Hac Vice)(Upton, Stacy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of a case to a U. S. magistrate judge for trial. (CTF) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that counsel for plaintiff is required to provide the plaintiff's social security number to the U. S. Attorney's Office within 10 days. This notice is to be made outside the electronic case filing (CM/ECF) system. (CTF) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4357271, B-5700, related document #1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner, filed by Shelley Elaine Helfers.(CTF). (Upton, Stacy) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Answer Deadline: Social Security Administration, Commissioner served on June 6, 2023, answer due August 5, 2023. (CTF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner, filed by Shelley Elaine Helfers.(CTF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
