Guerrero v. Blakely et al
| Paul Rudy Guerrero |
| Mike Blakely, Mike Gunter, Gary Lovell and County of Limestone |
| 6:2012cv01072 |
| April 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Jasper Office |
| Marion |
| Paul W Greene |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 3/27/2015. (AHI)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED for the reasons stated herein, the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED; It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend his request for injunctive relief is DENIED, and all claims against all defendants are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), except plaintiff's claim that defendant Gunter deprived him of due pro cess of law when he refused to allow plaintiff to make a post-arrest telephone call for 13 days; It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claim that defendant Gunter deprived him of due process of law when he refused to allow plaintiff to make a post-arrest telephone call for 13 days is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 9/12/2014. (AHI)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
