Cannon v. Corizon Medical Services et al
||Roy M Cannon
||Corizon Medical Services, Alabama Department of Corrections, Gordy and Warde Estees
||December 29, 2015
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Karon O Bowdre
||Staci G Cornelius
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 4, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the objections to it, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judges report and ACCEPTS her recommendation. Accordingly, the plaintiffs claims against Nurses Alexander, Coleburn, and McDougle are due to be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motions for summary judgment filed by Corizon, Dr. Hood, and Nurses Amborski, Clay, Bryant, Bunn, and Thurmon (Docs. 41 , 61 ) are due to be GRANTED, the court finding no genuine issues of material fact exist. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 2/4/2019. (KEK)
|October 30, 2017
ORDER The court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS her recommendation. The court ORDERS that the plaintiff's claims against Defendants ADOC, Dunn, Johnson, and Duncan are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ; 1915A(b)(1). The court further ORDERS that the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical claims against Defendants Corizon, Hood, Ambroski, Clay, Alexzander, Bryant, Coleburn, Thurman, McDougal, and Bunn are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 10/30/17. (SAC ) *Order placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?