Headrick v. Osborne et al
| William Randall Headrick |
| Ronnie Osborne and Elizabeth Williams |
| 6:2020cv01081 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Gray M Borden |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons stated above, the court RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due by 10/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 9/21/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 3
ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his jail and/or prison account statements. Doc. #2 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b), it is ORDERED that the application is GRANTED. The plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $20.86 to commence this action, and thereafter to make monthly installment payments toward payment of the full filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/10/2020. (KEK)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Randall Headrick. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ronnie Osborne, Elizabeth Williams, filed by William Randall Headrick.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
