Bryant v. Upton et al
Deairo Deshawn Bryant |
Tanar Upton, Chris Hubbard, Chris Whitley and Franky Maccaffery |
6:2021cv01246 |
September 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Staci G Cornelius |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this matter be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution; Objections to R&R due by 11/24/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/10/2021. (KAM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient for the reason(s) indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within 30 days from the entry date of this notice, in the manner explained below. Although the plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the application was not accompanied by a certified copy of jail and/or prison account statements for the last six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/28/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deairo Deshawn Bryant. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chris Hubbard, Franky Maccaffery, Tanar Upton, Chris Whitley, filed by Deairo Deshawn Bryant.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.