Fenimore v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fenimore
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Case Number:
7:2012cv00424
Filed:
February 7, 2012
Court:
Alabama Northern District Court
Office:
Western Office
County:
Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge:
L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit:
Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:
29:201
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fenimore v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael L Lucas |
Represented By: | Ashley H Hattaway |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Daniel Fenimore | |
Represented By: | Joshua Buck |
Represented By: | Thomas F Campbell |
Represented By: | Donald K McGowin |
Represented By: | Mark Russell Thierman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.