Maestas-Kaufman v. Bibb County Jail

Plaintiff: Samuel Allen Maestas-Kaufman
Defendant: Bibb County Jail
Case Number: 7:2014cv02258
Filed: November 21, 2014
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Bibb
Referring Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Presiding Judge: William M Acker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 26, 2016 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the magistrate's 22 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Certain claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJDUCICE and the remaining claims are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings as set out herein. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 9/26/2016. Copy served on plff on this date. (YMB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maestas-Kaufman v. Bibb County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samuel Allen Maestas-Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bibb County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?