Resendez v. Adduci

Petitioner: Esmeralda Sanjuani Resendez
Respondent: A. Washington Adduci
Case Number: 7:2015cv01340
Filed: August 10, 2015
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Pickens
Referring Judge: John E Ott
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2017 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the Magistrate Judge's 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 2/21/2017. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Resendez v. Adduci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Esmeralda Sanjuani Resendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A. Washington Adduci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?