Whitley v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clyde T Whitley
Defendant: Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2015cv01403
Filed: August 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
County: Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge: Sharon Lovelace Blackburn
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously, it is ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal with Prejudice [see doc. 87 in 7:10-cv-0467-SLB] is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 1/11/16. (SMH)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 1/11/16. (SMH)
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to #3 Amended Complaint by Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc..(Lucas, Michael)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc., filed by Clyde T Whitley.(Thierman, Mark)
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc., filed by Clyde T Whitley.(complaint originally filed in 7:10cv467-SLB on 3/9/2010; see order of severance 77 )(MRR )
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ORDER in 7:10-cv-467-SLB directing that the 18 plaintiffs be severed and assigned new case numbers; the filing fee is waived; an amended complaint shall be filed by 9/4/2015. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 8/17/2015. 7:10cv467 remains plaintiff David Ledbetter only, the severed plaintiffs and case numbers are as follows; Richard Curtis 7:15cv1392; Forrest Scott Fikes 7:15cv1393; Dennis Finnen 7:15cv1394; Richard E. Gonzalez 7:15cv1395; Clinton M. Johnson 7:15cv1396; Jeffrey L. McAllister 7:15cv1397; Timothy A. Nichols 7:15cv1398; Maurice E. Phillips 7:15cv1399; Danny R. Simmons 7:15cv1400; Brad Walker 7:15cv1401; Marty J. Weaver 7:15cv1402; Clyde T. Whitley 7:15cv1403; Donald R. Williams 7:15cv1404; Jimmy Hudson 7:15cv1405; Timothy Jones 7:15cv1406; Dennis O'Kennedy 7:15cv1407; Rex Robertson 7:15cv1408; Donald P. Smith 7:15cv1409. (MRR )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitley v. Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clyde T Whitley
Represented By: Mark Russell Thierman
Represented By: Joshua Buck
Represented By: Mark R Theirman
Represented By: Donald Keiron McGowin
Represented By: Leah L Jones
Represented By: Thomas F Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes Benz U.S. International, Inc.
Represented By: Michael L Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?