Hannah v. Aspire Physical Recovery Center of West Alabama LLC

Plaintiff: James Hannah
Defendant: Aspire Physical Recovery Center of West Alabama LLC
Case Number: 7:2017cv01016
Filed: June 16, 2017
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 7, 2017 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 21 MOTION to Dismiss Counts 2, 4, and 5. Counts 1, 3, and 6 of the Amended Complaint remain pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/7/2017. (JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hannah v. Aspire Physical Recovery Center of West Alabama LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Hannah
Represented By: Albert Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aspire Physical Recovery Center of West Alabama LLC
Represented By: Brooke M Nixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?