Garten v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Petitioner: Kathryn G Garten
Respondent: Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Case Number: 7:2017cv01584
Filed: September 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
County: Pickens
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Presiding Judge: Herman N Johnson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION - Having reviewed the materials in the record, the Court accepts the magistrate judge's recommendation. By separate order, the Court will dismiss this habeas petition with prejudice. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 2/24/2020. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garten v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kathryn G Garten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Represented By: John D Saxon, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?