Davidson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Kandi Davidson
Defendant: Progress Rail Service Corporation and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Case Number: 7:2018cv01237
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Counsel for the Plaintiff has informed the Court that a settlement has been reached in this matter. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Any party may, for good cause shown, reopen this action within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Costs are taxed as paid. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 3/26/2019. (PSM)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 6/28/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 7/31/2019. Joint Status Report due by 7/12/2019. Bench Trial set for 1/21/2020 at 9:00 AM in Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 12/12/2018. (PSM)
December 12, 2018 NOTICE: The Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2018 at 11:30 AM is hereby CANCELLED. The Court will enter a scheduling order consistent with the parties Rule 26 Report. (PSM)
December 3, 2018 NOTICE SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2018 at 11:30 AM in chambers, Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. At least one attorney for each party must attend the conference in person.(PSM)
November 30, 2018 Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Thrash, Braxton)
October 22, 2018 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Progress Rail Service Corporation.(Wahlheim, William)
October 15, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.(Wahlheim, William)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Progress Rail Service Corporation's response to the complaint is due 10/22/2018. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on October 15, 2018. (EBV)
October 15, 2018 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Progress Rail Service Corporation. (Thrash, Braxton)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. All Defendants have until October 15, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on October 10, 2018. (EBV)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 10/5/2018. (PSM)
October 5, 2018 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Progress Rail Service Corporation. (Thrash, Braxton)
September 26, 2018 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kandi Davidson. Progress Rail Service Corporation waiver sent on 7/6/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Martin, David)
September 19, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Progress Rail Service Corporation mailed certified mail (KAM)
September 19, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kandi Davidson. Progress Rail Service Corporation served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (TLM, )
September 11, 2018 Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Kandi Davidson. (KAM)
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Kandi Davidson. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint)(Martin, David)
September 6, 2018 Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kandi Davidson. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company waiver sent on 9/4/2018, answer due 11/3/2018. (Martin, David)
August 7, 2018 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number B4601091133. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Progress Rail Service Corporation, filed by Kandi Davidson.(PSM). (Martin, David) Modified on 8/8/2018 (TLM, ).
August 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Progress Rail Service Corporation, filed by Kandi Davidson.(PSM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davidson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progress Rail Service Corporation
Represented By: Braxton Scott Thrash
Represented By: William B Wahlheim, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Braxton Scott Thrash
Represented By: William B Wahlheim, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kandi Davidson
Represented By: Miles Clayborn Williams
Represented By: David P Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?