Strickland v. Peters et al
Petitioner: Timothy C Strickland
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Kenneth Peters
Case Number: 7:2020cv00840
Filed: June 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Referring Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Respondents have filed an answer seeking dismissal of this habeas petition. (Doc. #4 ). The court deems the case ripe for summary disposition under Rule 8(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases on the basis of the defenses asserted in Respondents' answer. Petitioner shall have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to supply any additional evidentiary materials or legal arguments he may wish to offer with regard to whether the petition is subject to summary dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 7/28/2020. (KEK)
July 28, 2020 Filing 4 Respondents's ANSWER to Complaint by Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Kenneth Peters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 1, #2 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 2, #3 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 3, #4 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 4 - part 1, #5 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 4 - part 2, #6 Exhibit 1 - Vol. 5, #7 Exhibit 2, #8 Exhibit 3, #9 Exhibit 4, #10 Exhibit 5, #11 Exhibit 6, #12 Exhibit 7, #13 Exhibit 8, #14 Exhibit 9, #15 Exhibit 10, #16 Exhibit 11, #17 Exhibit 12, #18 Exhibit 13, #19 Exhibit 14, #20 Exhibit 15)(Starrett, Marc)
July 28, 2020 MOTION of Respondent treating #4 Answer as a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to #5 Order. (KEK)
June 25, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Starrett on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Kenneth Peters (Starrett, Marc)
June 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED Respondents appear and show cause in writing within forty-two (42) days from the date of this Order, why the relief Petitioner requests should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 6/18/2020. (KEK)
June 18, 2020 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number B4601106652. (KEK)
June 13, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Timothy C Strickland.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strickland v. Peters et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy C Strickland
Represented By: Basil Timothy Case
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Represented By: Marc Starrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenneth Peters
Represented By: Marc Starrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?