Bustillos v. Randall-Reilly LLC
| Joanne Bustillos |
| Randall-Reilly LLC |
| 7:2021cv00900 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0151 ta |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 08/20/21.(RWS)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Randall-Reilly LLC. (McDaniel, James) |
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 07/28/2021. (LSB)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joanne Bustillos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Hiraldo, Ignacio) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 07/27/2021. (LSB)
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER denying #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The required fee has not been paid. Signed by Judge L. Scott Coogler on 07/27/2021. (LSB)
|
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3891867. (Hiraldo, Ignacio) |
|
Filing 8
UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/22/2021. (PSM)
|
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Randall-Reilly LLC. filed by Randall-Reilly LLC (McDaniel, James) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Randall-Reilly LLC. (McDaniel, James) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Joanne Bustillos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Hiraldo, Ignacio) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joanne Bustillos. Randall-Reilly LLC served on 7/12/2021, answer due 8/2/2021. (KEK) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Randall-Reilly LLC. (PSM) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Joanne Bustillos. (Cox, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Randall-Reilly LLC, filed by Joanne Bustillos.(PSM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3875652 (B4601114364). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Randall-Reilly LLC, filed by Joanne Bustillos.(PSM). (Cox, John) Modified on 7/2/2021 (MEB2). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bustillos v. Randall-Reilly LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joanne Bustillos | |
| Represented By: | John Richard Cox |
| Represented By: | Ignacio J Hiraldo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Randall-Reilly LLC | |
| Represented By: | James Ethan McDaniel |
| Represented By: | John David Collins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
